Further evidence that child poverty will rise under a @JeremyCorbyn led @UKLabour Government …

Standard
The impact of the benefit cap, that a Jeremy Corbyn led Labour Government will maintain indefinitely, grows …A mother given 50p a week for housing: the benefit cap one year on
A year after the lower benefit cap was introduced, families go without food and fuel and are forced to use food banks …

“A year on from the introduction of the lower benefit cap, its abiding legacy is to push people closer to homelessness.

The cap, introduced on 7 November 2016, reduced the total amount any family can receive in benefits from £26,000 to £23,000 in London and £20,000 outside the capital, leaving families with significant shortfalls between the benefits they get and the cost of their housing.

In our most recent research we spoke to 18 families with capped benefit across the UK and each time we heard a familiar story – one of stress, struggle and a daily fight to remain in their home.

Half of those families said they had gone without food, fuel or were otherwise in debt as a result of the cut. Among a raft of other hardships a third said they had been forced to use food banks.

That’s hardly surprising when the government’s most recent figures show that nearly a third of the 68,000 families that were capped have lost by between £50 and £100 a week in benefits.

One mother’s testimony poignantly sums up the impact of the policy; she told us that every day she thinks about the prospect of losing everything and being forced out of her family’s home. A single mother, she had given up work to look after her young baby and the cap slashed her housing benefit to just 50p a week.

Meanwhile many housing associations and councils have told us that they have to provide intensive support to tenants affected by the cap just to make sure they can keep their home.

When the original cap was first proposed it was argued that it was unfair that households who were not working were being supported to live in expensive areas, which many working families would not be able to afford.

But the government’s latest figures show that the majority of people hit by the cap have children, and many are in receipt of benefits that recognise they are not able to work. In fact half of the families affected are on income support and 15% are on employment and support allowance.

If the hardship the cap is causing is not a good enough reason to scrap it, then the fact that the policy is undermining the government’s own attempts to solve the housing crisis surely is.

For the first time in a long time it feels like we are winning the argument that we need many more homes that people can afford. Theresa May making a commitment to invest £2 billion and talking about the need to invest in homes offered at the cheapest rents represented real progress.

But this renewed impetus to build new homes will be wasted if people that need them most cannot afford them.

The lower benefit cap is one of a number of policies that demonstrate the government is yet to reconcile its housing aims with its approach to welfare. Meanwhile evidence revealing the scale of poverty seems to grow by the day – most recently the Child Poverty Action Group warned that years of government cuts have left many families at risk of poverty.

Welfare and housing are inextricably linked and the sooner the government realises this and takes action, the sooner it can get on with the business of solving our housing crisis.”

Melanie Rees is head of policy at the Chartered Institute of Housing

A mother given 50p a week for housing: the benefit cap one year on

“end the freeze on housing benefit and re-link it back to rents. This would make an instant difference to those on lower incomes, stemming the tide of families being made homeless after falling on hard times only to find they don’t get enough financial support to keep a roof over their head. The NAO recently pointed this out. But bafflingly it’s a call Labour have still refused to back, including in Corbyn’s speech today (at Labour’s 2017 Annual Conference), despite spending pledges in other areas.”

 

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s