Just a bit of fun, just a bit of fun, as Peter Snow used to say at election time. I am using March 2014 (workforce jobs by industry (SIC 2007) and sex – unadjusted) UK figures and a House of Commons of 650 Members:
Total number in work: 32,992,000 (650 MPs)
Total number of males in full time work: 14,223,000 (280 MPs)
Total number of females in full time work: 7,957,000 (158 MPs)
Total number of males in part time work: 3,113,000 (61 MPs)
Total number of females in part time work: 7,699,000 (151 MPs)
We have heard a lot lately of the House of Commons not reflecting the make up of the workforce of the UK, well this is how it would look if that were that not the case:
A : Agriculture, forestry and fishing: 1.4% or 9 MPs.
B : Mining and quarrying: 0.2% or 1 MP.
C : Manufacturing: 7.8% or 51 MPs.
D : Electricity, gas, steam and air conditioning supply: 0.4% or 3 MPs.
E : Water supply; sewerage, waste management and remediation activities: 0.6% or 4 MPs.
F : Construction: 6.4% or 42 MPs.
G : Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles and motorcycles: 14.7% or 96 MPs.
H : Transportation and storage: 4.6% or 30 MPs.
I : Accommodation and food service activities: 6.1% or 40 MPs.
J : Information and communication: 3.9% or 25 MPs.
K : Financial and insurance activities: 3.4% or 22 MPs.
L : Real estate activities: 1.8% or 12 MPs.
M : Professional, scientific and technical activities: 8.4% or 55 MPs.
N : Administrative and support service activities: 8.3% or 54 MPs.
O : Public administration and defence; compulsory social security: 4.7% or 31 MPs.
P : Education: 8.8% or 57 MPs.
Q : Human health and social work activities: 12.9% or 84 MPs.
R : Arts, entertainment and recreation: 2.9% or 19 MPs.
S : Other service activities: 2.5% or 16 MPs.
T : Activities of households as employers;undifferentiated goods-and services-producing activities of households for own use: 0.3% or 2 MPs.
Food for thought, eh? Particularly, because I have yet to hear many of the Commentariat talking about cleaners, social workers, local government officers, civil servants, scientists, nurses, teachers et al taking their rightful place in the House of Commons.
Yes, those who have worked in manufacturing are under-represented, but these figures are by industry so there would be clerical workers amongst the 51. And the military? Well, given the number of those with a military background even in today’s House of Commons then one may well claim they are over-represented. They would only earn, under this method of calculation, 4 MPs. I challenged a (ex army) ukipper a while ago on Twitter about his assertion that, having been in uniform then his views should carry more weight than most of the rest of the electorate. He snapped back, what are you, a shelf stacker? Well, I have news for him, the shelf stackers have it!